<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <icon>http://www.uncorrelated.com/favicon.ico
   <title>UNCoRRELATED</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:,2008:/1</id>
   <updated>2008-08-07T19:13:29Z</updated>
   <subtitle>A center right view of the world with a low tolerance for demagoguery</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Despite MSM, Obama News</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/despite_msm_obama_news.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4075</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T19:01:34Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T19:13:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Not a MSM publication, Human Events reporting on the short stay of Obama&apos;s Muslim advisor, who hails from Chicago. Original WSJ here. Today&apos;s Sun Times story here (apparently it&apos;s all Islamophobia according to CAIR--why does any reputable publication ever quote...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anne Leary</name>
      <uri>backyardconservative.blogspot.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[Not a MSM publication, <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27932">Human Events</a> reporting on the short stay of <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/another-obama-advisor-under-the-bus-shady-muslim-outreach-director-stepsdown/">Obama's Muslim advisor</a>, who hails from Chicago. Original WSJ <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121797906741214995.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us">here</a>. Today's Sun Times story <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1096027,CST-NWS-obmuslim07.article">here</a> (apparently it's all Islamophobia according to <a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/05/cairhamasterror.html">CAIR</a>--why does any reputable publication <span style="font-style: italic;">ever</span> quote them? And the Sun Times obfuscates--it's not that Obama is a Muslim--he's not. It's that he has <a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/obamas-springfield-years.html">very radical friends and supporters</a>, Christian or otherwise.) Tribune? Former PLO spokesman (when it was classified as a terrorist organization) <a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/05/sore-point.html">Rashid Khalidi</a> surfaces in the HE piece:
<blockquote style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">Obama’s ties to another Muslim activist are seen as troubling. Obama made a presentation at a farewell dinner in 2003 for Rashid Khalidi. Khalidi has close ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization

According to <i>The Case Against Obama</i>, a new book by David Freddoso (published by Regnery), Khalidi’s group -- the Arab American Action Network -- held a fundraiser for Obama in 2000, and the group is now working on an oral history project about the great “catastrophe” of Israel’s founding. </blockquote><a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/obama-big-lie.html"><span style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">Any</span></a> <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/2008/eon0629df.html">one </a>of Barack's associations would sink any other candidate. What is it that keeps Obama afloat? Dishonest and <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080807/ap_on_el_pr/obama_hawaii_influence;_ylt=AnHn5bQVC3L_qTL8.Tt2bmyyFz4D">credulous </a>media types? Though the press is apparently getting a little tougher, since he keeps <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0708/Nagourney_vs_Obama_.html">attacking them</a>. <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021180.php">Powerline</a>, excerpt from the other day:
<p></p><blockquote style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"><p>Now in fairness to Obama, this exchange followed some pretty aggressive initial questioning from a pushy talk show host. And Obama actually handled himself well during much of the interview. Even so, a political figure who can't explain a controversial vote on key legislation without first attacking the professionalism of the reporter is probably not ready to run for, much less serve as, president. Obama could use more time in the Senate to (a) learn about the legitimate role of the press in this country and/or (b) develop thicker skin.</p>  <p>Obama's problem may be one of temperament. But it's also true that he's spent his adult life in a bubble of likemindedness and adulation. Was he ever forced to argue with conservatives -- or people presenting the conservative viewpoint as devil's advocates -- at the elite academic institutions he's been associated with or on the <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Southside of Chicago where the terrorist William Ayers and the anti-American bigot Jeremiah Wright pass as mainstream figures</span>? I haven't seen any evidence that he was. We do hear that, as head of the Harvard Law Review (a position he seems to have obtained without being on the road to writing a publishable student note), he listened to the conservative point of view. That's to his credit. But listening when one is in a position of authority is not the same thing as debating.</p></blockquote><p></p>Do the MSM and Democrat operatives think Americans are stupid and easily led? <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/barack_the_cable_guy.html">Barack the cable guy</a>, don't make me laugh. Get 'er done? What has Barack Obama ever done except run for political office? Now we're supposed to elect him based on his <a href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/the_devil_in_the_details.html">competence</a>? (Pay no attention to <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjIzYzUzMzQ3NTNlNjUyNzZmMjQ1MTNkMTMzZDFhZGE=">my liberal record</a>, America.) It didn't work for Dukakis. Guess the Obama as post-partisan <a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/real-obama.html">glow is fading</a>. And the MSM is <a href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/information_seeks_it_level.html">barely in the news business</a> these days.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Pickens-Your-Pockets</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/pickensyourpockets.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4076</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T18:21:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T19:39:36Z</updated>
   
   <summary>As a word of explanation for readers not in the U.S., the airwaves have been flooded recently by commercials on both television and radio by oil magnate T. Boone Pickens, urging Americans to take the energy crisis seriously and support...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mick Stockinger</name>
      <uri>www.uncorrelated.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[As a word of explanation for readers not in the U.S., the airwaves have been flooded recently by commercials on both television and radio by oil magnate T. Boone Pickens, urging Americans to take the energy crisis seriously and support alternative energy proposals like wind farms.

The ads of generated not inconsiderable comment from the pundit class, some lauding his environmental instincts, others criticizing his misrepresentation of money being paid for foreign oil as <em>wealth transfer</em>.

The latter criticism is valid--Pickens plays fast and loose with the facts in order to cultivate the sense of crisis, but his critics are missing the point.]]>
      <![CDATA[
Pickens is building the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19231397/">largest wind farm in the world</a>, 4,000 Megawatts worth, in the panhandle of Texas.  He'll be nearly doubling wind farm capacity in Texas.  All of this is passing strange because other current wind farm projects in Texas have been called off because they are financially infeasible.

The Texas energy market is mostly deregulated, allowing retail providers, transmission systems and power generation to make market decisions to supply the needs of Texans.  For the most part it appears to have worked well--Texas generally has a comfortable energy reserve because it has managed to attract investment to the state.  What people should know though is that energy is produced in a hierarchy of cheap to are-you-kidding.

Coal and nuclear plans are expensive to build, but designed to run continuously and at low cost.  They are inevitably the backbone of every state's energy production system.  Next comes natural gas and alternative energy plants that provide power for peak needs beyond what the backbone plants produce.  These plants can turn their power generation capacity on and off, but run comparatively less efficiently than coal or nuclear.  Who gets the call to run is a key element in understanding T. Boone Picken's ad blitz.

For all the Democrats talk of wind and solar, these are still inefficient and unreliable sources of power, in spite of decades of development.  If they could be better, they would be, but progress has its limitations.  Its hard for them to even compete with natural gas plants, which very often improve their overall efficiency by selling steam to nearby industrial plants like refineries or other types of process industries.  The plants sell the product of burning natural gas twice--once for electricity, and a second time for heat.  They are also built in close proximity to major energy consumers, so the transmission loss is minimized.

All this puts wind and solar at the periphery of the energy economy--the 7-11s of energy production--when you need an energy-twinky right now and don't mind paying through the nose for it.

A six billion dollar investment in what is essentially a spot market makes no sense at all, much less a one trillion dollar investment for a national system of wind farms. It only works if wind energy is no longer low man on the totem pole, if you <em>change the rules of the game</em>.  You have to distort the market to put it to the head of the queue.  Pickens is quite explicit about this in his ad--<em>free up natural gas resources to run vehicles</em>.  For that, he needs to transform wind energy from an economic concern, to a religious one--saving the planet.  People will make sacrifices in the name of religion, meaning of course that they will willing pay more for energy than they should.

If Pickens can create the ground swell of public support for his plan, he can effectively steamroll his business rivals and their political assets.  Oppose the Pickens plan and you're a dirty-dealing, no-good planet killer.

Pickens intends to get even richer the old fashioned way--he's going to steal it from the pockets of the little guy and dare them to complain about it.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Democrat  Business Sense</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/democrat_business_sense.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4074</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T17:43:09Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T18:05:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Congress is fast approaching single-digit approval ratings and Nancy Pelosi&apos;s personal approval rating is somewhere south of George W. Bush&apos;s. I know, we&apos;ll publish a book!...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mick Stockinger</name>
      <uri>www.uncorrelated.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Crat Overlords" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      Congress is fast approaching single-digit approval ratings and Nancy Pelosi&apos;s personal approval rating is somewhere south of George W. Bush&apos;s.

I know, we&apos;ll publish a book!
      <![CDATA[The geniuses that brought you...well nothing from the past two years that the Democrats have been masters of the House, have once again manifested their total cluelessness.  A book that sets up Nancy Pelosi as a role model for women looking to balance home and career has sold a grand total of 2,737 books in its first week of release according to Nielson bookscan.

The book benefited from substantial promotion from publisher Doubleday, with high-profile interviews on all the NBC gabfests.

Apparently American women just aren't wondering how Nancy does it all.

My guess is that no one even did any market research.  The use of book publishing contracts to <strike>bribe</strike> reward leading politicians is an old business.  They get a big advance and whether the publisher makes a profit or not is incidental and irrelevant.  The trick though is usually to make it appear like lots of books are selling, to at least create the illusion of normal commerce and as to not embarrass the politico.

Book sales, like Hollywood movie profits, are unknown to anyone except a few trusted accounts.  The public numbers are crap.  The exceptions would be Amazon and Barnes & Noble databases, but as Hillary Clinton's book demonstrated, there are shenanigans going on there as well.

If you want to see a book really sell, then go to Costco on a books release date.  If there is a pallet full of books by the front door and everybody going through the checkout has at least one, but probably two or three copies, then you know you have a real best seller on your hands.  Such was my experience last Saturday as I witnessed Stephenie Meyer's latest oeuvre fly off the shelves (or pallet in this case).  I saw not a single browser of Pelosi's book, much less anyone with one in their cart.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Information Seeks it Level</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/information_seeks_it_level.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4073</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T16:45:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T17:41:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The John Edwards non-scandal that continues to not continue, is an interesting insight into the mediasphere and the interaction between its various and sundry pieces. Byron York observes what everybody does--the Edward&apos;s love child scandal isn&apos;t playing in a major...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mick Stockinger</name>
      <uri>www.uncorrelated.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Evil Dudes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="The Blogosphere" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="The Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[The John Edwards non-scandal that <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2RiMzNjZDc3ZmJjODg0MDkzZTMzMWQyZGI3ZTE5MGM=#more">continues to not continue</a>, is an interesting insight into the mediasphere and the interaction between its various and sundry pieces.

Byron York observes what everybody does--the Edward's love child scandal isn't playing in a major national newspaper near you, yet just about everyone you talk to knows about it.  Moreover, I haven't actually encountered anyone who disbelieves the story.  That's quite remarkable, considering how the left and the right in this country have been quite content to not only have their own opinions, but their own facts about such weighty matters as the Iraq war and whether Valerie Plame was outed by Karl Rove.

The mainstream media has sandbagged against the flood, but the flood came anyways and they remain islands of ignorance in a sea of public awareness.  What an odd place for purveyors of information to be.]]>
      <![CDATA[Unless of course they are something else--not purveyors of information, but chroniclers of history, practioners of <em>doublethink</em>.
<blockquote>
<em>The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them . . . . To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies — all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.</em> (Orwell, George (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four)</blockquote>

Yet even in totalitarian societies, information still found its way through.  I distinctly remember reading commentary back in the early 1980s about how Russians would glean information from Pravda by what was <em>not said</em>.  Sudoku players will understand this concept very well--the logical derivation of value and position from absence.

To date, the Democrats have not achieved the Canadian ideal of <em>crimethink</em>, and thus the oh-so-serious mainstream media make themselves objects of ridicule, as they engage in the fiction that they are keeping the story out of the public consciousness by refusing to talk about it.  Ironically, Byron York himself is touched with this delusion, as he mused over when the mainstream media will <em>legitimize</em> the story by covering it.

Begging Mark's pardon, but this seems an awful lot like the British penchant for according legitimacy and authority to the royals when its abundantly clear to everyone else that they are totally irrelevant.

Too many of us are yet in an anachronistic thrall to mainstream media authority--they don't matter folks, the Edwards love child scandal is just the latest proof in an what is becoming an unending stream of evidence.  Perhaps it is true that old ideas only die when the people who held them do, but is that really necessary?

We are fast approaching the denouement--the media candidate, Barack Obama (Peace be upon his name) is likely to repeat the ignoble performances of George McGovern and Michael Dukakis.

If you really want the news, read the National Enquirer.

P.S: The Enquirer has a front page teaser about Obama's infidelities--enquiring minds want to know...

UPDATE:  Good stuff at <a href="http://gawker.com/5034058/exploding-the-edwards-mistress-scandal">Gawker</a>.

<blockquote><em>Oh yes, the buttoned-down media will soon be lapping this story up with a spoon.

See, previously the Edwards scandal was just an irrelevant trifle about how the maybe next U.S. attorney general or even vice president had a baby with another woman while his wife died of cancer and possibly paid the mistress hush money and lied to everyone about it. But now it's about how a speaker at a meaningless convention might distract the media from covering the media event in the way media handlers prefer. In other words, a REAL story. </em></blockquote>

Interesting trap Edwards is in--up the ante by issuing a stronger denial and risk being totally hosed by evidence the Enquirer is keeping in reserve, or stand pat and hope for reasonable doubt to gild his long-term prospects.  Not surprisingly, the post's negative comments don't actually state a disbelief in the allegations, but opinions of whether the mainstream media is <em>acting responsibly</em> by ignoring the story, or annoyance that the candidate's sexual proclivities are a matter of public discussion.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Edwards Love Child</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/edwards_love_child_2.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4072</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T16:31:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T16:35:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Off the veep list, out at the Dem convention? Can&apos;t keep this quiet any more, even though the MSM is pretty much ignoring the story. Kaus is talking about it now and the former Edwards campaign people are not going...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anne Leary</name>
      <uri>backyardconservative.blogspot.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="2008" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[Off the veep list, out at the Dem convention? Can't keep this quiet any more, even though the <a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;ned=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ncl=1234240719">MSM</a> is <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/46637.html">pretty much</a> ignoring the story. <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2196758/">Kaus</a> is talking about it now and the former Edwards campaign people are not going to carry him any more. <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2RiMzNjZDc3ZmJjODg0MDkzZTMzMWQyZGI3ZTE5MGM=">Byron York</a>, NRO.

]]>
      <![CDATA[Cheating on his dying wife. Can you get any lower than that?

I suppose he expects people to think he's practically a hero for trying to shelter his wife. Where have we heard that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/flowers012398.htm">before</a>.

And this should give those supporting a <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080806194222.o84em5uv&amp;show_article=1">Hillary revival</a> pause... but it won't. (<a href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/07/the_big_yawn.html">We</a> haven't forgotten,  though.)

Should be a <span style="font-style: italic;">lovely</span> convention.

  --crossposted at BackyardConservative]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Devil in the Details</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/the_devil_in_the_details.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4071</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T15:01:49Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T16:39:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>My inability to write about every impression I had of Barack Obama (peace be upon his name...) has produced an unexpected benefit--larger impressions about what his candidacy means for the country. Let me put it succinctly--the man is personally incompetent...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mick Stockinger</name>
      <uri>www.uncorrelated.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      My inability to write about every impression I had of Barack Obama (peace be upon his name...) has produced an unexpected benefit--larger impressions about what his candidacy means for the country.

Let me put it succinctly--the man is personally incompetent to run for office--any office.

The nature of political campaigns often obscures the personal qualifications, or perhaps its more accurate to say, the personal disqualifications for office.  I&apos;ve interviewed a number of aspiring candidates at this point, and I&apos;m always a little shocked when it becomes clear--excuse what might appear as arrogance--that I&apos;m smarter than these guys.

I don&apos;t want to vote for people with less knowledge, experience, judgment and native intelligence than I have--especially since I wouldn&apos;t consider myself a particularly suitable candidate for important office.  I am also wise and humble enough (and proud of it!) to refrain from making snap judgments about relative intellectual merits, since I&apos;ve known many brilliant people who don&apos;t manifest the traditional ornaments of a good mind--articulate, nimble debate and exposition.

In spite of this, I can&apos;t help but conclude--I&apos;m smarter than Barack Obama (Peace be upon his name).
      <![CDATA[I don't arrive at that conclusion lightly, but its very clear that I know the issues better than he does, and can spontaneously articulate those issues and their nuances better than he can.  I would never make this mistake for example.
<blockquote>
<em>"Making sure your tires are properly inflated, simple thing, but we could save <strong>all the oil that they're talking about getting off drilling</strong>, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups. You could actually save just as much." </em></blockquote>

This statement is clearly the result of a politician getting fed a few talking points with no real grasp of the complexity of fuel efficiency.  He kind of half heard it, kind of understood the main point and "went with it"--a serious intellectual deficiency in almost every field of endeavor.  In the real world, people go to great efforts to get precise answers and to acknowledge where there is ambiguity.

You can't even make a strudel with this lack of mental discipline.

Ironically, it was a timely comment, because I just tuned the bimmer, and I keep weekly records of miles per gallon.  You actually have to get pretty far out of tolerance before you notice changes in fuel usage.  What Barack Obama (Peace be upon his name) isn't saying is that modern cars, say those made after 2000, are remarkable feats of engineering that actively compensate for changing environmental and systemic conditions and have significant overcapacity engineered right into them.  I changed my spark plugs much later than I had planned and when I removed them, after 130,000 miles (they were the originals), they displayed all the characteristics of a perfectly tuned engine--tan, no deposits, and virtually no corrosion.  I changed my air filter as well.  The comparison?  No significant change in mpg, meaning less than one percent which could be attributed to variations in driving conditions (which are pretty consistent for this car...)

I changed the tires recently as well, but since I keep them religiously rotated, balanced and properly inflated, I didn't expect to see a difference, and I didn't.  Interesting thing about tires--did you know that different makes and models have different rolling resistance?  Yeah--you can have them properly inflated and they'll still use more fuel because their designed to.  Tire design is a tradeoff between a number of factors, and sometimes you give up low rolling resistence for better traction.

My point is that the world is made up of details and the difference between a brilliant success and a dismal failure usually lies in those details.  I just came back from California where burger restaurants are even more ubiquitous than they are in the rest of the U.S.  No matter--we made a bee-line for In-N-Out.  I'm embarrassed to admit that I consumed a double-double three days in a row.  Why is the In-N-Out jam-packed every lunch hour, while you can hear crickets chirping just next door at their competitors?  Its basically the same thing everywhere--bun, hamburger patty, cheese, lettuce and tomato, but small details create these huge disparities in patronage.

Barack Obama (Peace be upon his name) exemplifies the antithesis of the model of success in the modern world.  Where everyone from lawyers, engineers and cooks is killing themselves to get the details right, he can't be bothered.

This is the guy you want to put in charge of the executive branch?

There is only one reason to support Barack Obama for president--he makes an excellent puppet for other interests.  He doesn't have the skills, experience or predilection to actually challenge any information provided to him, and thus is a prime candidate for manipulation.  He'll have the power to promote your interests while also being the perfect fall guy when it all goes to hell.

One could argue that McCain is no better, except that he clearly is better.  McCain called the surge correctly because he didn't just accept the prevailing wisdom and political calculus, but did the due diligence to arrive at an independent conclusion.  He may not know all that much about economics, but he's demonstrated the mindset of a successful executive--dig for the details that make the difference.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Proof Labs Make Lousy Guard Dogs</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/proof_labs_make_lousy_guard_do.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4070</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T05:07:56Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T05:25:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>My Labrador also goes off duty at night: A mountain lion crept through an open door into a house outside Denver, snatched a Labrador retriever from a bedroom where two people were sleeping and left the dog&apos;s dead body outside,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Calder</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Miscellaneous" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[My Labrador also <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,398502,00.html">goes off duty at night</a>:

<blockquote>A mountain lion crept through an open door into a house outside Denver, snatched a Labrador retriever from a bedroom where two people were sleeping and left the dog's dead body outside, wildlife managers said Tuesday.

...Another dog sleeping in the room wasn't harmed. 

...The couple said <em><strong>the dogs didn't bark</strong> </em>to warn them of the mountain lion.</blockquote>

<a href="http://www.pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/022556.php">H/T</a>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Be careful what you wish for</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/be_careful_what_you_wish_for.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4069</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T03:06:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T03:40:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The netroots got its wish for presumptive nominee - His Obamaness, the metrosexual world citizen with no old-fashioned signifiers like wealth creation or military service or executive achievement; faux academic, faux lawyer, real community activist..good jobs, publicly funded jobs for...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Adams</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[The netroots got its wish for presumptive nominee  - His Obamaness, the metrosexual world citizen with no old-fashioned signifiers like wealth creation or military service or executive achievement; faux academic, faux lawyer, real community activist..good jobs, publicly funded jobs for our good. 

Well, suppose this paragon trails in the polls in a couple of weeks..behind in the polls in 2008, the year of the Democrat, the Year of the Rat. What then in Denver? Oh ho, here's what then. It won't be just the Clintons beaming 'we told you so.' Winning matters and a glance at comment threads on liberal sites shows doubt setting in. Kerry was well ahead at this point. Paris Hilton seems more Presidential. Journalists are losing their religion.  He's in danger of becoming a figure of fun. The battle tested white-haired dude's campaign is drawing blood every day now. Losing matters, so the Democratic Convention may be one poisonous event. A resurrection for Hillary is a long shot, Allah be praised, but I may smile <em> seeing my enemies driven before me and the lamentations of their women.  </em>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Tanned, Rested, Ready to Blog...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/tanned_rested_ready_to_blog.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4068</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T02:09:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T02:20:02Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A combination of business and vacation travel (10 states!) have conspired to keep me from regular blogging for about six weeks now--a record since we started UNCoRRELATED. It actually drove me a little crazy on some days when I would...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mick Stockinger</name>
      <uri>www.uncorrelated.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Housekeeping" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      A combination of business and vacation travel (10 states!) have conspired to keep me from regular blogging for about six weeks now--a record since we started UNCoRRELATED.

It actually drove me a little crazy on some days when I would hear or see something that just begged a post--alas, internet access has been rare or non-existent in many of the places I&apos;ve been, sometimes by design, and sometimes not.  I especially appreciated the irony of being in Southern California and unable to poach of WIFI connection anywhere.

I expect to make one more trip this month--to Denver and the Democrat National Convention, but from what I hear, it won&apos;t be a problem getting a WIFI connection over there...

My thanks to Anne, Mark and Dave for keeping fresh content on the site...
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Robots learn to move themselves</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/robots_learn_to_move_themselve.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4067</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-07T01:26:22Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-07T01:31:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Per the BBC, story and video....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anne Leary</name>
      <uri>backyardconservative.blogspot.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="_44896550_robots226body.jpg" src="http://www.uncorrelated.com/_44896550_robots226body.jpg" width="226" height="170" align="right"/>Per the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7544099.stm">BBC</a>, story and video.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Real Obama</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/the_real_obama.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4066</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-06T17:27:54Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-06T17:34:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Voters are bored of Barack? He stalls in the polls. Throws another adviser under the bus. Is a laughingstock on his lecturing us to inflate our tires for energy independence. Claims he&apos;s not an elitist celeb, but George Clooney is...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anne Leary</name>
      <uri>backyardconservative.blogspot.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[Voters are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080806/ap_on_el_pr/poll_obama_overexposure">bored of Barack</a>? He <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12334.html">stalls</a> in the polls. Throws <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/05/another-obama-advisor-under-the-bus-shady-muslim-outreach-director-stepsdown/">another adviser</a> under the bus. Is a <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021179.php">laughingstock </a>on his lecturing us to inflate our tires for energy independence. Claims he's not an elitist celeb, but George Clooney is hosting a fundraiser for him in <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/05/hollywood-megastar-to-host-fundraiser-for-obama/">Switzerland</a>.<a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0806pageaug06,0,6970038.column"> Clarence Page</a> worries in the Trib:  ]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"><em>Schmidt threw Rove's famous brand of hardball attacks at Obama's perceived weak points and recast him as an empty-headed "celebrity." His freshness is recast as inexperience. His seriousness is recast as hubris and arrogance. His empathy is recast as elitism.</em>
</blockquote>Freshness? The machine pol from Chicago? Seriousness? When his ignorance is so easily displayed? Empathy? When his spiritual adviser for 20 years was the hate-spewing racist Rev. Wright? Obama has a new worry-- what about <a href="http://www.blogher.com/winning-women">winning women</a>? New McCain ad:  Family <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_3DxDBH9nn4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_3DxDBH9nn4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object>

  --crossposted at BackyardConservative]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Dreams From My Farmer</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/dreams_from_my_farmer.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4065</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-06T16:27:44Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-06T16:42:28Z</updated>
   
   <summary> The economy is a top issue for voters, and in key swing states in the Midwest and around the country it may come down to your opinion of the farm bill. It&apos;s not so simple. Consumers in Chicago are...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anne Leary</name>
      <uri>backyardconservative.blogspot.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Polity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[<img alt="corn-field.jpg" src="http://www.uncorrelated.com/corn-field.jpg" width="250" height="200" align="right"/>
The economy is a top issue for voters, and in key <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080806/ap_on_el_pr/candidates_farm_policy">swing states in the Midwest</a> and around the <a href="http://www.dnronline.com/news_details.php?AID=30432&amp;CHID=1">country</a> it may come down to your opinion of the farm bill. It's not so simple. Consumers in Chicago are hit hard by high food and <a href="http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=224028&amp;src=1">gas prices</a>, and hog farmers in Iowa are hurt by high corn prices as well. There are <a href="http://webstar.postbulletin.com/agrinews/292851110811655.bsp">other</a> unintended consequences. <a href="http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.28396,filter.all/pub_detail.asp">Ethanol is a water hog</a>, imperiling aquifers urban and rural. And the farm bill makes us Ugly Americans abroad. Sen. Obama is from Illinois, a farm state, but the bill exemplifies how Washington is broken, something Barack Obama <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/08/05/chicago-tribune-reporter-bashes-pelosis-oil-pretzel-logic">does nothing</a> to <a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/dontgo.html">fix</a>. More from <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjIzYzUzMzQ3NTNlNjUyNzZmMjQ1MTNkMTMzZDFhZGE=">David Freddoso</a>, "Dreams From My Farmer:<span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><span class="articlesubtitle"><span style="font-style: italic;">If Obama is a reformer, why doesn’t he vote like one?</span>"</span>:]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote style="font-family: trebuchet ms;" face="trebuchet ms"> In <em>The Audacity of Hope, </em>Obama worries about the ugly image that Americans project to the world in the area of trade. We demand, he writes, that “developing countries eliminate trade barriers that protect them from competition, even as we steadfastly protect our own constituencies from exports that could help lift poor countries out of poverty.”

This laudable concern did not prevent him from voting for the farm bill, whose entire purpose was to “protect our own constituencies from exports that could help lift poor countries out of poverty.” By supporting the bill, Obama was voting to increase subsidies for American crops that make other nations’ crops uncompetitive (additionally, the majority of the money goes to commercial farms with an average net worth of nearly $2 million).<span class="WW-FootnoteReference1">. </span>His vote increased the price support that causes Americans to pay double the world price for sugar. He also helped keep in place tariffs and import limits against certain crops from developing countries — especially against sugar from developing countries like Brazil and the Caribbean nations.

The bill that Obama voted for even bars the U.S. government from purchasing crops in the poor nations where we are providing food aid. When President Bush vetoed the bill, demanding at least that this last provision be changed, Sen. Obama voted to override the veto.</blockquote> Not buying food from poor farmers in poor countries to feed the poor means they can not lift themselves out of poverty by developing their own economy. They are dependent on the American government--this is the same culture of dependency Obama's policies would foster at home. This is not reform, it's more of the same old failed liberal Democrat policies of the past--and it always comes up short.

Maverick Sen. McCain brought some straight talk to Chicago when he <a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/05/lard-omelet.html">blasted the Farm Bill</a> back in May. Ethanol subsidies in the bill make food even more expensive, and it's not without other costs:
<blockquote  style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span class="FootnoteCharacters"> </span>In 2008, ethanol’s ravages started to make headlines — this “green fuel” was contributing to record-high food prices and causing food riots in the developing world. It was exhausting water supplies, <a href="http://www.heritage.org/research/energyandenvironment/wm1925.cfm">driving up gasoline prices</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18162493/">exacerbating smog</a>. Environmentalists, who almost universally oppose ethanol, even complained that its production process is driving up emissions from coal<span class="WW-FootnoteReference1234"></span>.</blockquote> In a year when farm income is at historic highs, it is wrong to shower goodies on the well-fed when families are making hard choices about buying gas or putting food on the table. And a Democrat Congress leaving town without acting on a serious energy bill is callous and irresponsible. Americans need more than dreamy <a href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/mccain-ad-broken.html">words that don't mean anything</a>--we need real leadership, real reform, and results.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Life Goes On</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/life_goes_on.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4064</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-06T05:18:54Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-06T05:21:06Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I&apos;m alive - and doing well. July turned into a busy month as my family prepared for my daughter&apos;s wedding. She married last Friday. We had a wonderful time and we look forward to my son&apos;s wedding next month....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Calder</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Miscellany" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      I&apos;m alive - and doing well.

July turned into a busy month as my family prepared for my daughter&apos;s wedding. She married last Friday.  We had a wonderful time and we look forward to my son&apos;s wedding next month.

      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Retro-authentic is fashionable</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/retroauthentic_is_fashionable.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4063</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-05T20:00:09Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-05T20:18:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Mark Adams</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="2008" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[<div>
</div><div>
</div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_ka0juPNqXOI/SJimr6ul_LI/AAAAAAAAAh4/Px1IjVv-oIw/s1600-h/father2.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_ka0juPNqXOI/SJimr6ul_LI/AAAAAAAAAh4/Px1IjVv-oIw/s400/father2.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5231114240620100786" /></a>
<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_ka0juPNqXOI/SJimrx-S1FI/AAAAAAAAAiA/0HjxNiv3GjM/s1600-h/father1.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_ka0juPNqXOI/SJimrx-S1FI/AAAAAAAAAiA/0HjxNiv3GjM/s400/father1.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5231114238270035026" /></a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>McCain Ad: Broken</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.uncorrelated.com/2008/08/mccain_ad_broken.html" />
   <id>tag:www.uncorrelated.com,2008://1.4062</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-05T19:16:25Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-05T19:20:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Barack Obama lies and lies and panders on energy. McCain rallying in the heartland. A GOP Guerilla Congress defies Nancy Pelosi and her games, which come at the expense of the American people. (We&apos;re fighting the nutroots too.) McCain&apos;s latest...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Anne Leary</name>
      <uri>backyardconservative.blogspot.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="McCain" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uncorrelated.com/">
      <![CDATA[Barack Obama <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021162.php"><span style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">lies</span></a> and <a style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);" href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021165.php">lies </a>and <a href="http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman/2008/08/obama-panders-o.html"><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">panders</span></a> on energy. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080805/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_5">McCain </a>rallying in the heartland. A <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YzJjYmExMjg4NmU2OWNlZTgwMGY5ZWJkZWUyZmM3YzA=">GOP Guerilla Congress</a> defies <a href="http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/aug/05/demcrats-there-is-no-crisis-on-our-side-of/">Nancy Pelosi and her games</a>, which come at the expense of the American people. (We're f<a style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);" href="http://www.thenextright.com/patrick-ruffini/dontgo-a-turning-point-for-the-right">ighting the nutroots</a> too.) McCain's latest ad, Broken:<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ylJkmMR8Fek&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ylJkmMR8Fek&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object>

  --crossposted at BackyardConservative]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
