emailaddr.jpg










About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 25, 2008 7:20 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Liberal Pinhead Self Congratulations.

The next post in this blog is Captain's Quarters Soon to be Vacant.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Blogs We Read

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

« Liberal Pinhead Self Congratulations | Main | Captain's Quarters Soon to be Vacant »

The Bearer of Bad News

Robert Novak asks who in the Democrat party will have the stature and evenhandedness to ask Hillary to leave the campaign.

The Democratic dilemma recalls the Republican problem, in a much different context, 34 years ago, when GOP graybeards asked: "Who will bell the cat?" -- or, go to Richard Nixon and inform him that he had lost his support in the party and must resign the presidency. Sen. Barry Goldwater successfully performed that mission in 1974, but there is no Goldwater facsimile in today's Democratic Party (except for Sen. Ted Kennedy, who could not do it because he has endorsed Obama).

Unlike so many other Washington pundits, Novak doesn't write whatever comes into his head. His columns reflect the Washington scuttlebutt. Party officials think they have their nominee and they don't want him winded or wounded from further primary battling. Yet they have nothing to offer the opponent as a meaningful concession.

The Republicans could offer Mitt Romney de facto party support for a future run, but Hillary already is the party's heir apparent. She really is Richard Nixon and the party has no Barry Goldwater around to tell her its over. That actually gives too much credit to Goldwater. Nixon hung on by his fingernails well past the time that their would have been anything salvageable from the mess.

The Clintons are looking into the political abyss, as is an entire network of supporters whose survival is inextricably bound to the fate of the candidate. For most candidates, it is the prospect of power that binds them to a candidate. In the case of the Clintons, it is the prospect of losing power.

The Clintons kept the gang together through eight years of Bush with the expectation that everyone would get their old jobs back (think Madeline Albright...). All those people betting on the wrong horse. Too many people with too much to lose if Hillary drops out, so Hillary's own formidable ambition and drive is going to be reinforced by everyone on the gravy train.

Bill could do it, but he won't. He has nothing to lose if Hillary crashes and burns and everything to gain if she wins--good, bad or ugly.

Obama is going to have to drive the stake through her heart to get a clear field, and not without a few teeth marks in his neck.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.uncorrelated.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/3187

Post a comment

(This site no longer requires authentication for unmoderated comments to be posted immediately. Simply enter your comment with a valid email address and type the challenge word into the field below before posting. UNCoRRELATED accepts no editorial responsibility for the comments posted here, but will by discretion, remove vulgar, abusive or commercially-motivated comments. You may receive email notification of follow-up comment by clicking on the Subscribe to this entry checkbox.)





Tom-Mannis.jpg thinkingblogger.jpg









Google PageRank 
Checker - Page Rank Calculator

Blogroll Me!

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe in Rojo

Add UNCoRRELATED to Newsburst from CNET News.com

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in FeedLounge

Add to netvibes

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to The Free Dictionary

Add to The Free Dictionary

Add to Plusmo

Subscribe in NewsAlloy

Add to Excite MIX

Add to netomat Hub

Add to Webwag

Add UNCoRRELATED to ODEO

Subscribe in podnova

Add to Pageflakes