Michael Barone called it a "safe-cracking" victory--all the tumblers had to fall into place for McCain to win.
The exit polls tell an interesting story.
South Florida Hispanics went for McCain by an overwhelming margin--54%. Will you not be surprised that Mel Martinez, a McCain collaborator on amnesty, put the word out through his machine that a vote for McCain was a vote in their interest. Notably, Romney had pretty much conceded the South Florida vote to Giuliani and didn't really compete there.
There it is--the just-shy of 100,000 votes that put McCain over the top. Won in the one state where a significant number of Hispanics vote in the Republican primary.
However, the safe-cracker analogy may have been more apt than Barone intended. Cubans may have voted for a undeclared Democrat, but apparently a lot of declared Democrats and independents voted for McCain in spite of what was supposed to be a closed primary.
Under Florida Republican party rules, someone who wants to vote in the Republican party primary has to register with the party 30 days before the election. Yet the CNN exit polls clearly show a massive 17% of respondents were declared independents and another 3% Democrats!

I suppose its possible that they all changed their party affiliation a month ago so they could vote for McCain, but it seems more likely that we've been outmaneuvered by McCain loyalists in the Florida party that rejiggered the rules for "their guys" benefit.
Something stinks here.
Michelle Malkin notes the same problem.
Yesterday afternoon, I noted reports of independents voting in the closed Florida Republican primary and pointed out the state law requiring that voters establish party ID by registering 29 days before an election.Flip Pidot took a look at exit poll results posted at CNN (see page 4) and wonders how 20 percent of GOP votes were cast by non-Republicans:
One breakout that puzzles me though is the vote share by party identification. Romney and McCain were tied among Republicans (33-33), while McCain won [independents] 44-23…
If I’m reading the poll correctly, it suggests 17% of Republican primary voters identified themselves as having no major party affiliation, while 3% identified themselves as registered Democrats.
So was it closed or not? Pidot probes further:
Exit polls rely on the accuracy of the verbal reponses given by the pollees and of course, aren’t definitively dispositive of anything at all. But 17% of 1,500 respondents self-identifying as independents who voted Republican means something irregular, unless hundreds of voters chose to tell pollsters a similar lie…
…I e-mailed that county’s supervisor of elections at around 2 pm on primary day to inquire about the reported irregularity, but have yet to receive a response.
Given the possibility that as much as 20% of the 2 million GOP votes cast today came from independents and Democrats (enough to change the outcome), I think we do now need some answers…
Anyone got any?
The exit poll had 1516 respondents, which makes it a big sample compared with the 500-800 respondents typical of all the tracking polls. Using an accuracy of +/- 4%, McCain would have picked up 65,000-70,000 additional votes, accounting for between 3.4 and 3.7% of his plurality.
Front-runner my ass.
Ed Morrissey points out that closed primary states typically have a significant contingent of independents who register before an election and then reregister as independent immediately afterwards. That's plausible I suppose, but 20%?
Its also besides the point. The media is crowing about the end of the Reagan coalition because McCain "won over" Republicans in Florida, but the reality is that his victory is entirely due--as usual, to independents. In any event, the backlash today on various blogs, talk radio callers, etc... is INTENSE. Everyone seems to have been willing to be polite to McCain when they thought he had no chance, but now that he is threatening the party's viability and assuring a Clinton/Obama victory, conservatives are mobilizing. It will be interesting to see what the effect will be on Feb 5.
That's up to you folks.
















Comments (5)
Mick,
No one likes to see their guy lose. I can understand that.
To see you arguing that McCain "stole" Florida based on exit polling predictions compared to actual vote counts is just sad. You are starting to sound like those leftwing nuts you always like to bash who wasted so much time and effort arguing that the two Bush elections were "stolen".
Buck up man. This post is pretty pathetic.
Posted by Jeremy | January 30, 2008 9:20 AM
Posted on January 30, 2008 09:20
Hmmm. I seem to have a lot of company. I believe I have read about 2 dozen posts on major blogs.
The title of the post is a teaser of course, but the issue is nevertheless real. The media is characterizing this as a win for McCain amongst Republicans. Its bullshit. Florida was no different that South Carolina or New Hampshire.
If you don't get the animus conservatives have for John McCain, I don't really blame you. You're a Democrat and you don't get it. But consider why the left is not nuts about Bush--its about the threat to the movement, not the man himself. McCain is a disaster for the Republican party in every respect.
Posted by Mick Stockinger | January 30, 2008 2:39 PM
Posted on January 30, 2008 14:39
I think the "major blogs" whining about stolen elections based on exit polling results sound a lot like the "Kossacks" and other crying Dems after the 2004 elections. If Romney loses the nomination are you going to blame it on those few voters in Florida who just weren't Republican enough? Do you think it was all a Democratic plot since they didn't have a real primary there this year?
As for McCain I agree with you even though I'm not a conservative. I'm no longer a Republican mainly because of Republicans like John McCain, Republicans who are willing to sell out small government principles for any trumped up crisis of the moment.
His proclaimed desire to impoverish our nation to reduce carbon emissions is foolish and borders on evil.
His estimation that we need a war in Iran and troops in the middle east for a hundred years so we can be saved from the terrorists is worse.
McCain-Feingold is about as good an example of Republican politicians in every branch of our government urinating on our constitution as any other I could come up with.
McCain would be bad for America.
If McCain is nominated are you going to maintain your passionate support for a Republican party that has left you behind? As Glenn Reynolds said in his post, everyone draws the line somewhere. For me it was GWB. Where's your line?
Posted by Jeremy | January 30, 2008 4:16 PM
Posted on January 30, 2008 16:16
Mick,
The 20% Independent/Democrat block wouldn't be an issue if it wasn't for the remaining 80% who claim to be Republican.
Posted by Dave Calder | January 30, 2008 5:22 PM
Posted on January 30, 2008 17:22
Check out my post on http://peoplepowergranny.blogspot.com. I write about how our voting machines are so screwed up and much more. Also folks can vote in my poll about voting machines. Stop by and add your comment.
Posted by People Power Granny | February 9, 2008 10:17 PM
Posted on February 9, 2008 22:17