I can't vouch for this, but having seen so much similar behavior, I tend to believe it.

At first, everyone had assumed that the Primary A/C, the Secondary A/C, and the Tertiary A/C had all managed to fail at once. But after cycling the power, the A/Cs all fired up and brought the room back to a cool 64°. At the time, the “why” wasn’t so important: the network administrators had to figure out how to bring online the four Exchange Services, six Domain Controllers, a few Sun servers, and the entire State Tax Commission’s server farm. Out of all of the downed servers, those were the only ones that did not come back to life upon a restart.

They worked day and night to order new equipment, build new servers, and restore everything from back-up. Countless overtime hours and nearly two hundred thousand dollars in equipment costs later, they managed to bring everything back online. When the Exchange servers were finally restored, the following email finally made its way to everyone's inbox, conveniently answering the “why”

From: ----- -----------
To: IT Department
Re: A/C constantly running.

To whom it may concern,

I came in today (Monday) to finish up a project I was working
on before our big meeting with the State ----- Commission tomorrow,
and I noticed that there were three or four large air conditioners
running the entire time I was here. Since it's a three day weekend,
no one is around, why do we need to have the A/C running 24/7?

With all the power that all those big computers in that room use, I
doubt it is really eco-friendly to run those big units at the same
time. And all computers have cooling fans anyway, so why put the A/C
for the building in that room?

I got a keycard from [the facility manager’s] desk and shut off the
A/C units. I'm sure you guys can deal with it being warm for an hour
or two when you come in tomorrow morning.

In the future, let's try to be a little more conscientious of our
energy usage!

Thanks,
-----

As for the employee who sent it, he decided to take an early retirement.

A hallmark of Democrat rhetoric is the removal of all context. The Prius is a "green car" if you remove the context. When you consider the dust-to-dust analysis, the Prius is three times more energy intensive than a Ford F-150 truck in spite of the fact that it uses less gas to go a mile.

Bush "lied us into war" until you examine the larger context and realize that Clinton administration officials had been saying the same things for years.

Social security, medical care, on and on... Anything can be made to look good or bad if you place it in a narrow enough context.