Elizabeth Edwards has a neighbor "problem".
Monty Johnson, who lives on family property acquired before the great depression, is getting the cold shoulder from the Edwardses, recently moved into their palatial 28,000 square foot home on 102 wooded acres.
Apparently Monty's place isn't quite up to snuff and he has greeted trespassers gun-in-hand. Worst of all, Monty's a Republican and features a sign supporting Rudy Giuliani on a fence near the Edward's gated driveway.
Johnson, 55, acknowledges his Republican roots. But he takes offense to the suggestion he has purposefully left his property, including an old garage he leases for use as a car shop, in dilapidated condition.Johnson said he has lived his entire life on the property, which he said his family purchased before the Great Depression. He said he's spent a lot of money to try and fix up the 42-acre tract.
"I have to budget. I have to live within my means," Johnson said. "I don't have millions of dollars to fix the place."
Elizabeth Edwards, whose cancer relapse has been a fund-raising bonanza for the Edward's campaign, doesn't expect she'll be too civil to Monty, whom she hasn't yet encountered in person.
"I wouldn't be nice to him, anyway," Edwards said in an interview. "I don't want my kids anywhere near some guy who, when he doesn't like somebody, the first thing he does is pull a gun out. It scares the business out of me."
During a recent unannounced visit to the Edwards estate, Mrs. Edwards greeted me somewhat differently:
Thank you, come again. Smithers, release the hounds.
As I was running for my life, I overheard her commenting:
What good is money if it can't inspire terror in your fellow man?
Wait a minute, that was Monty Burns, not Elizabeth Edwards. Nevertheless, the Edwards estate is posted with "no trespassing" signs. What do you think the chances of a little sight-seeing trip onto the Edwards' estate would generate an armed response? A "hound" response?
Ironically, Edwards announced his campaign in the backyard of a woman who lost her home in the Katrina hurricane. Poor people aren't so scary when they have a political advantage associated with them--sort of like cancer.
The problem will likely resolve itself though as Johnson is being forced by high taxes, to sell his property, probably to another rich Democrat.
"I thought he was supposed to be for the poor people," Johnson said. "But does he ever socialize with any poor people? He doesn't speak to me."Johnson said he has put his property on the market, in part blaming the high property taxes for his decision to leave. He also wants to move for another reason.
"I don't want to live somewhere where someone's always complaining about me," he said.
Two Americas indeed.
















Comments (5)
The Edwardses give rich, snobby, lawyers a bad name.
Posted by mark | April 9, 2007 1:12 PM
Posted on April 9, 2007 13:12
They aren't really much different from most rich people, whose wealth isolates them from the reality the rest of the country, much less the rest of the world endures.
Rich people literally can't understand the concept of "unaffordable". I recall a former boss complaining about an employee's dented car, sniffing that he would have fixed such damage immediately. He simply had no concept that someone could not afford to fix body damage to their car.
Then there is the rationalization on how one got rich in the first place. Frankly rich lawyers make me want to vomit because you know they extracted their wealth by the most vile means possible--exploiting the suffering of others for fun and profit. I hear lawyers on the radio and see them on television begging people to sue, often emphasizing how much money the target has to extort by litigation. It gives me the willies even thinking about it.
Edwards compounds my disgust (and apparently the disgust of many others as well) with his chutspah at purporting to champion "the poor" of this country.
There is a marvelous irony in his defensiveness about his own wealth--isn't "Two Americas" all about stoking class envy for his personal political gain?
Its the same lawyer schtick he's pulled since he got out of law school.
Posted by Mick Stockinger | April 9, 2007 7:41 PM
Posted on April 9, 2007 19:41
Pile my disgust on your disgust. The ambulance-hijacking weasel uses his wife's cancer as a campaign motif. Release the hounds, Smithers, the rabid, rabid hounds. Ruffle that girlish coif.
Posted by mark | April 10, 2007 3:10 AM
Posted on April 10, 2007 03:10
A neighbor who "greets people with gun in hand" would make most sane folks scared - it wouldn't matter if he's poor or if he's a millionaire. What a biased bunch of crap this piece was!
Mick, Personally, I respect lawyers who respresent victims like the man Edwards fought for who suffered a brain injury due to a doctor prescribing a drug overdose. And I respect self-made men or women like Edwards or Hillary more than privileged frat boys who used Daddy's name & influence to get where they are --like royal screw-up "NU-CU-LAR
BUSH" and Mitt Romney.
Posted by sandy | October 28, 2007 12:38 AM
Posted on October 28, 2007 00:38
Its pretty clear that Elizabeth Edwards is lying about the "gun in hand" business since she has never met the man.
I was surprised to learn that Hillary was a self-made man.
Would she be a Senator today if her husband hadn't been president? Would she be running for president if she wasn't married to Bill?
The only thing she's ever done by herself is be a lawyer in Arkansas.
I think you just got all lib-emotional on us when confronted with the truth about Edward's hypocrisy. At this point it doesn't really matter--Edwards is toast.
Posted by Mick Stockinger | October 29, 2007 10:17 AM
Posted on October 29, 2007 10:17