As I am reading through the "news" this morning, I'm realizing that the media is geared up for the primaries yet have very little to report as news.
Guiliani thinks his aide's bag (in which the lost campaign strategy were stored) was intercepted during the unloading and loading of a private plane. Clearly something happened, but this is less than rumor at this point--does it really merit a story?
Drudge anticipates a New York Times report on Hillary in which she is purported to say that she thinks Obama will fade as people realize how inexperienced he is. Is that really news? What else would you expect Senator Clinton to say? Campaigning 101 states that you emphasize your perceived strengths in the criticism of your rivals.
The Washington Post writes similarly vapid copy by musing over Obama's youthful drug use even as it chants the mantra of Obama's "new voice" in politics. Obama isn't a new voice--he's simply the black John McCain with a lot less experience. Can you imagine if McCain and Obama have to run against each other? "I'm more candid---no, no, I'm more candid..."
As for his drug use--he's a Democrat. Its a given that a Democrat politician comes with a raft of vices. The real question is--is he still using? The other obvious question is if Obama were by some miracle to become President, would he be accused of being high in similar fashion to how the left has accused Bush of being drunk? Probably not--not because Conservatives are "nice", but because their criticisms tend to be more sophisticated that what you typically find on the left.
So basically its a no news round-up, but since the media has devoted a lot of staff to the 2008 elections already, we've got gossip passing for news.
















Comments (1)
Sometimes I think you throw comments into your posts just to get my goat so I'll comment.
It is a little rich for you to state, "As for his drug use--he's a Democrat. Its a given that a Democrat politician comes with a raft of vices.” when you are the unqualified supporter of our current president, a recovering drug/alcohol addict.
In fact...with the exception of the squeaky clean Mormon candidate the Republican contingent of possible presidential candidates for 2008 has quite an impressive raft of moral vices. Glass houses…throwing stones…etc.
I agree with you on the general point of your post. Analysis of 2008’s election is lame and tedious because it is still too early for anything productive or useful to be discussed. Rumors and innuendo are all the media has right now so we’re stuck with it.
Posted by Jeremy | January 3, 2007 9:45 AM
Posted on January 3, 2007 09:45