emailaddr.jpg










About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 23, 2006 10:28 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Centanni and Wiig Seen and Heard.

The next post in this blog is Blogger Liaison?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Blogs We Read

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

« Centanni and Wiig Seen and Heard | Main | Blogger Liaison? »

Open Internet Access A Recruiting Tool?

I was recently at a job site with such restrictive internet access that I could not retrieve a needed file even though I tried FTP, SFTP, email and a couple of other more obscure methods.

The site had a broadband link, but the real problem was an incredibily restrictive internet access corporate policy.

I finally drove to a nearby town and poached a WIFI connection to get my files...

Microsoft executives are implying that this kind of policy is not just an annoyance, but will make a company uncompetitive when trying to attract talented new employees.

“These kids are saying: forget it! I don’t want to work with you. I don’t want to work at a place where I can’t be freely online during the day,” said Anne Kirah, Microsoft Senior Design Anthropologist.

I think she's spot on. Kirah goes on to point out that the new generation is "digitally native", implying that they are so integrated and dependent on digital communication, that they simply will not work in primitive pre-digitial environments.

Kirah cited a Norwegian psychologist who claimed that young people were now so reliant on digital communication that “taking a mobile phone away from a teenage girl is the same as child abuse.”

I wouldn't go that far, but it is an very effective punishment for the rising generation.

Nevertheless, even paranoids have enemies.

While the rising generation is digitally integrated, they aren't necessary safe users. The cost of cyber mischief is impressive and open internet access just isn't financially feasible for most corporations. I would throw the ball back into Microsoft court and ask why they haven't done more to assure an open computing environment that is also a safe environment.

My ISP has spam filiters, My outlook runs spam filters, and yet I get 10 spam emails a day that make it into my inbox. A recent article I can't find anymore, admitted that aside from reformatting and reinstalling the operating system, there is no way to be sure that a machine compromised into a bot net, is actually free from infection.

Cyber security has a bright future...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.uncorrelated.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/817

Post a comment

(This site no longer requires authentication for unmoderated comments to be posted immediately. Simply enter your comment with a valid email address and type the challenge word into the field below before posting. UNCoRRELATED accepts no editorial responsibility for the comments posted here, but will by discretion, remove vulgar, abusive or commercially-motivated comments. You may receive email notification of follow-up comment by clicking on the Subscribe to this entry checkbox.)





Tom-Mannis.jpg thinkingblogger.jpg









Google PageRank 
Checker - Page Rank Calculator

Blogroll Me!

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe in Rojo

Add UNCoRRELATED to Newsburst from CNET News.com

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in FeedLounge

Add to netvibes

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to The Free Dictionary

Add to The Free Dictionary

Add to Plusmo

Subscribe in NewsAlloy

Add to Excite MIX

Add to netomat Hub

Add to Webwag

Add UNCoRRELATED to ODEO

Subscribe in podnova

Add to Pageflakes