emailaddr.jpg










About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 10, 2006 10:56 PM.

The previous post in this blog was I've Gotcha Now.

The next post in this blog is Dems Land No Blows in Round 2.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Blogs We Read

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33

« I've Gotcha Now | Main | Dems Land No Blows in Round 2 »

Schumer G.

Schumer G.jpgAs usual, the promised fireworks you always hear about from the Democrats failed to appear at today's Alito hearings.

US News and World Report characterized today's hearings this way:

Can it be that the promisedfireworks at this week's Supreme Court confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committeehave already fizzled? Grinding through the first round of questioning, even liberal Sens. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts and Joseph Biden of Delaware spoke at length but failed to hit their stride, much lessruffle Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, whoseanswers, deliveredin an earnest monotone, had all the zip of aremedial high school civics lesson.

Its a remarkably predictable hearing, with the Democrats sounding like three chord guitar players. Sometimes I just couldn't believe what I was hearing. One thing Schumer said actually made NPR's audio excerpt list and its worth listening to just to understand how confused he is

Judge Alito, in case after case, you give the impression of applying careful legal reasoning, but too many times you happen to reach the most conservative result. Judge Alito, you give the impression of being a meticulous legal navigator but in the end, you always seem to chart a rightward course . Some wrongly suggest we're being results-oriented when we question the results you have reached, but the opposite is true. We're trying to make sure that you're capable of being fair, no matter what the identity of the party before you. Sometimes you give the government a free pass, but refuse to give the plaintiffs a fair shake.

Schumer's problem with Alito appears to be that his process just isn't producing the predetermined results that the left demands, after all, everybody should take turns being right.

The entire exchange reminded me of the current series of NBA commercials with Ali G.. The Ali G schtick is fabulous, relying on political correctness to prevent his targets from pointing out that his questions betray colossal ignorance and stupidity. Schumer G. relies on much the same paradigm, knowing that as a Senator and a liberal icon, everything he says is brilliant no matter how transparently foolish.

( Here's on online version of Ali G. interviewing Steve Nash--hiliarious)

The Captain did a little bit of his own transcription of Schumer' remarks as well.


SCHUMER: Does the Constitution protect the right to free speech?

ALITO: Certainly it does. That's in the First Amendment.

SCHUMER: So why can't you answer the question of: Does the Constitution protect the right to an abortion the same way without talking about stare decisis, without talking about cases, et cetera?

ALITO: Because answering the question of whether the Constitution provides a right to free speech is simply responding to whether there is language in the First Amendment that says that the freedom of speech and freedom of the press can't be abridged. Asking about the issue of abortion has to do with the interpretation of certain provisions of the Constitution.

SCHUMER: Well, OK. I know you're not going to answer the question…

SCHUMER G.: It is 'cos I is black?

taidhgin

Evangelical Outpost

A good round up of the left's views on the hearings (were we in the same building?) at Desert Rat Democrat

Freedom Eden

I love this post by bardseyeview comparing the Alito hearings to Shakespeare's Coriolanus (go read this one).

Matt May rants well.

Political Teen

Professor Bainbridge
makes the observation that Democrat Senators are failing to disconfit Alito because they talk too much.

Perhaps it's an occupational hazard of being a politician, but for a bunch of ex-lawyers they sure are lousy questioners.

Let me make another observation--the Senators are not trying to "get" Alito, they are instead trying to make points with their liberal constituencies. Alito merely provides a pretext to burnish the abortion credentials and to make common cause with the MoveOn.org crowd. Democrats knew up front that they couldn't block the Alito nomination, so when life gives you lemons, you make lemonade--use the process for fund-raising, and as an opportunity to bolster one's public profile (too bad only serious wonks actually watch this stuff...).

Powerline: Character witnesses

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.uncorrelated.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/42

Post a comment

(This site no longer requires authentication for unmoderated comments to be posted immediately. Simply enter your comment with a valid email address and type the challenge word into the field below before posting. UNCoRRELATED accepts no editorial responsibility for the comments posted here, but will by discretion, remove vulgar, abusive or commercially-motivated comments. You may receive email notification of follow-up comment by clicking on the Subscribe to this entry checkbox.)





Tom-Mannis.jpg thinkingblogger.jpg









Google PageRank 
Checker - Page Rank Calculator

Blogroll Me!

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Subscribe in Rojo

Add UNCoRRELATED to Newsburst from CNET News.com

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in FeedLounge

Add to netvibes

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to The Free Dictionary

Add to The Free Dictionary

Add to Plusmo

Subscribe in NewsAlloy

Add to Excite MIX

Add to netomat Hub

Add to Webwag

Add UNCoRRELATED to ODEO

Subscribe in podnova

Add to Pageflakes